Lecture
by Professor Malik
Scribe
notes written by Wilson Cheng
Date:
October 11, 1999 (Monday)
==============================================================================================
From
last lecture, we learned:
· Textons are atoms of
perception.
· Segmentation using normalized
cuts.
· Julesz's textons filter
representations.
i)
Averages
ii)
Marginal histograms
iii)
Joint histograms --> ('new' textons)
We
understand how to find Wij but how do we find the texture
boundaries? We must find textons
boundaries and compare them.
Using
the Chi Square test:
2 k [hi(m) – hj(m)]
X (hi, hj) = ½ å ---------------
M=1 hi(m) + hj(m)
2
Wij
= exp (-X (hi,
hj) / stex
Review a little bit more about “norm”:
L1 norm |V1| + |V2| + … + |Vn|
2 2 2
L2 norm Ö(V1 + V2 + … Vn )
Linf norm = MAX |Vi|
i
Using
an example of post offices as an illustration:
P’s
are post offices.
Goto
nearest post office, then find the space closest to the next post office
(“Dual”
notion of neighbors also known as “dual” representation);
Then
compute set of neighbors == Delaunay neighbors
Find
average distance by taking the median.
Whether
a line is a boundary of another object or it’s interior segments can be tested using
the Chi-Square test.
If
texture is inside, Chi-Square » 0.
The
above phenomenon where boundaries are seen as interior segments is called
“crowding”
· Measuring texture
similarities by using texton histograms.
Contour
Texture
Wij = Wij * Wij
Gate
contour texture cues are based on boundary versus interior test.
Conclusion:
If
possible, we should use global analysis for it’s more accurate than local
examination. Also combining information
from different scientific sources gets you more accurate results.
=================
END OF SCRIBE NOTES =================