Cheng Tien Ee, Vijay Ramachandran, Byung-Gon Chun, Kaushik Lakshminarayanan and Scott Shenker
EECS Department
University of California, Berkeley
Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2007-27
February 11, 2007
http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2007/EECS-2007-27.pdf
The Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) allows each autonomous system (AS) to select routes to destinations based on semantically-rich and locally-determined policies. This autonomously exercised policy freedom can cause instability, where unresolvable policy-based disputes in the network result in interdomain route oscillations. Several recent works have established that such instabilities can only be eliminated by enforcing a globally accepted preference ordering on routes (such as shortest path). To resolve this conflict between policy autonomy and system stability, we propose a distributed mechanism that enforces a preference ordering only when disputes resulting in oscillations exist. This preserves policy freedom when possible, and imposes stability when required.
BibTeX citation:
@techreport{Ee:EECS-2007-27, Author = {Ee, Cheng Tien and Ramachandran, Vijay and Chun, Byung-Gon and Lakshminarayanan, Kaushik and Shenker, Scott}, Title = {Resolving Inter-Domain Policy Disputes}, Institution = {EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley}, Year = {2007}, Month = {Feb}, URL = {http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2007/EECS-2007-27.html}, Number = {UCB/EECS-2007-27}, Abstract = {The Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) allows each autonomous system (AS) to select routes to destinations based on semantically-rich and locally-determined policies. This autonomously exercised policy freedom can cause instability, where unresolvable policy-based disputes in the network result in interdomain route oscillations. Several recent works have established that such instabilities can only be eliminated by enforcing a globally accepted preference ordering on routes (such as shortest path). To resolve this conflict between policy autonomy and system stability, we propose a distributed mechanism that enforces a preference ordering only when disputes resulting in oscillations exist. This preserves policy freedom when possible, and imposes stability when required.} }
EndNote citation:
%0 Report %A Ee, Cheng Tien %A Ramachandran, Vijay %A Chun, Byung-Gon %A Lakshminarayanan, Kaushik %A Shenker, Scott %T Resolving Inter-Domain Policy Disputes %I EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley %D 2007 %8 February 11 %@ UCB/EECS-2007-27 %U http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2007/EECS-2007-27.html %F Ee:EECS-2007-27