File System Performance and Transaction Support
Margo Ilene Seltzer
EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley
Technical Report No. UCB/CSD-93-765
, 1993
http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1993/CSD-93-765.pdf
This thesis considers two related issues: the impact of disk layout on file system throughput and the integration of transaction support in file systems. <p>Historic file system designs have optimized for reading, as read throughput was the I/O performance bottleneck. Since increasing main-memory cache sizes effectively reduce disk read traffic, disk write performance has become the I/O performance bottleneck. This thesis presents both simulation and implementation analysis of the performance of read-optimized and write-optimized file systems. <p>An example of a file system with a disk layout optimized for writing is a log-structured file system, where writes are bundled and written sequentially. Empirical evidence in [ROSE90], [ROSE91], and [ROSE92] indicates that a log-structured file system provides superior write performance and equivalent read performance to traditional file systems. This thesis analyzes and evaluates the log-structured file system presented in [ROSE91], isolating some of the critical issues in its design. Additionally, a modified design addressing these issues is presented and evaluated. <p>Log-structured file systems also offer the potential for superior integration of transaction processing into the system. Because log-structured file systems use logging techniques to store files, incorporating transaction mechanisms into the file system is a natural extension. This thesis presents the design, implementation, and analysis of both user-level transaction management on read and write optimized file systems and embedded transaction management in a write optimized file system. <p>This thesis shows that both log-structured file systems and simple, read-optimized file systems can attain nearly 100% of the disk bandwidth when I/Os are large or sequential. The improved write performance of LFS discussed in [ROSE92] is only attainable when garbage collection overhead is small, and in nearly all of the workloads examined, performance of LFS is comparable to that of a read-optimized file system. On transaction processsing workloads where a steady stream of small, random I/Os are issued, garbage collection reduces LFS throughput by 35% to 40%.
Advisors: Michael R. Stonebraker
BibTeX citation:
@phdthesis{Seltzer:CSD-93-765, Author= {Seltzer, Margo Ilene}, Title= {File System Performance and Transaction Support}, School= {EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley}, Year= {1993}, Month= {Jun}, Url= {http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1993/6285.html}, Number= {UCB/CSD-93-765}, Abstract= {This thesis considers two related issues: the impact of disk layout on file system throughput and the integration of transaction support in file systems. <p>Historic file system designs have optimized for reading, as read throughput was the I/O performance bottleneck. Since increasing main-memory cache sizes effectively reduce disk read traffic, disk write performance has become the I/O performance bottleneck. This thesis presents both simulation and implementation analysis of the performance of read-optimized and write-optimized file systems. <p>An example of a file system with a disk layout optimized for writing is a log-structured file system, where writes are bundled and written sequentially. Empirical evidence in [ROSE90], [ROSE91], and [ROSE92] indicates that a log-structured file system provides superior write performance and equivalent read performance to traditional file systems. This thesis analyzes and evaluates the log-structured file system presented in [ROSE91], isolating some of the critical issues in its design. Additionally, a modified design addressing these issues is presented and evaluated. <p>Log-structured file systems also offer the potential for superior integration of transaction processing into the system. Because log-structured file systems use logging techniques to store files, incorporating transaction mechanisms into the file system is a natural extension. This thesis presents the design, implementation, and analysis of both user-level transaction management on read and write optimized file systems and embedded transaction management in a write optimized file system. <p>This thesis shows that both log-structured file systems and simple, read-optimized file systems can attain nearly 100% of the disk bandwidth when I/Os are large or sequential. The improved write performance of LFS discussed in [ROSE92] is only attainable when garbage collection overhead is small, and in nearly all of the workloads examined, performance of LFS is comparable to that of a read-optimized file system. On transaction processsing workloads where a steady stream of small, random I/Os are issued, garbage collection reduces LFS throughput by 35% to 40%.}, }
EndNote citation:
%0 Thesis %A Seltzer, Margo Ilene %T File System Performance and Transaction Support %I EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley %D 1993 %@ UCB/CSD-93-765 %U http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1993/6285.html %F Seltzer:CSD-93-765