Shuanhu Wang and Joseph M. Hellerstein and Ilya Lipkind

EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley

Technical Report No. UCB/CSD-98-1012

1998

This publication is archived. It is kept only for reference purposes, so it is no longer being updated and may not meet accessibility standards. If you need this content in a different format, please email webteam@eecs.berkeley.edu.

http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1998/Archive/CSD-98-1012.pdf

Near-neighbor search is an increasingly important operation for queries over multimedia, text, and other non-standard datatypes. In large databases, near-neighbor searches must be enhanced by indexed retrieval for efficiency. In this paper, we present a detailed analysis of three proposals for near-neighbor search: one based on the R-tree, and two which motivated the invention of new trees, namely the SS-tree and SR-tree. We find that while the new trees do improve performance, the reason for their improvement comes mostly from a new Penalty metric, and not from a variety of other details in their implementation. Our analysis was done using a Generalized Search Tree, which both allowed us to easily do a fair comparison, and also provided the framework for a clearer analysis of the issues at hand.


BibTeX citation:

@techreport{Wang:CSD-98-1012,
    Author= {Wang, Shuanhu and Hellerstein, Joseph M. and Lipkind, Ilya},
    Title= {Near-Neighbor Query Performance in Search Trees},
    Year= {1998},
    Url= {http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1998/5796.html},
    Number= {UCB/CSD-98-1012},
    Abstract= {Near-neighbor search is an increasingly important operation for queries over multimedia, text, and other non-standard datatypes. In large databases, near-neighbor searches must be enhanced by indexed retrieval for efficiency. In this paper, we present a detailed analysis of three proposals for near-neighbor search: one based on the R-tree, and two which motivated the invention of new trees, namely the SS-tree and SR-tree. We find that while the new trees do improve performance, the reason for their improvement comes mostly from a new Penalty metric, and not from a variety of other details in their implementation. Our analysis was done using a Generalized Search Tree, which both allowed us to easily do a fair comparison, and also provided the framework for a clearer analysis of the issues at hand.},
}

EndNote citation:

%0 Report
%A Wang, Shuanhu 
%A Hellerstein, Joseph M. 
%A Lipkind, Ilya 
%T Near-Neighbor Query Performance in Search Trees
%I EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley
%D 1998
%@ UCB/CSD-98-1012
%U http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1998/5796.html
%F Wang:CSD-98-1012