A Comparison of Two Peripheral Displays for Monitoring Email: Measuring Usability, Awareness, and Distraction
Gary Hsieh and Jennifer Mankoff
EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley
Technical Report No. UCB/CSD-03-1286
2003
http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2003/CSD-03-1286.pdf
Email overloading is an ongoing problem for information workers. One critical phase of email management involves deciding whether to respond to the arrival of a new message. We present the design and evaluation of two displays intended to support this activity (a Ticker and a physically-based colored Orb). Both are peripheral displays, designed to sit at the periphery of a user's attention. Unlike previous displays, our most successful display was easily visible even off the desktop, and both our displays limit notifications to emails that pass through a filter, thus limiting notifications about spam and other less useful emails. Surprisingly, our animated Ticker was not distracting. Both displays were well liked and supported awareness. We also present a comparison of the relative merits of different methods for measuring usability, awareness, and distraction in the lab and the field. Our results suggest that a combination of techniques is most informative for peripheral display design.
BibTeX citation:
@techreport{Hsieh:CSD-03-1286,
Author= {Hsieh, Gary and Mankoff, Jennifer},
Title= {A Comparison of Two Peripheral Displays for Monitoring Email: Measuring Usability, Awareness, and Distraction},
Year= {2003},
Url= {http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2003/5776.html},
Number= {UCB/CSD-03-1286},
Abstract= {Email overloading is an ongoing problem for information workers. One critical phase of email management involves deciding whether to respond to the arrival of a new message. We present the design and evaluation of two displays intended to support this activity (a Ticker and a physically-based colored Orb). Both are peripheral displays, designed to sit at the periphery of a user's attention. Unlike previous displays, our most successful display was easily visible even off the desktop, and both our displays limit notifications to emails that pass through a filter, thus limiting notifications about spam and other less useful emails. Surprisingly, our animated Ticker was not distracting. Both displays were well liked and supported awareness. We also present a comparison of the relative merits of different methods for measuring usability, awareness, and distraction in the lab and the field. Our results suggest that a combination of techniques is most informative for peripheral display design.},
}
EndNote citation:
%0 Report %A Hsieh, Gary %A Mankoff, Jennifer %T A Comparison of Two Peripheral Displays for Monitoring Email: Measuring Usability, Awareness, and Distraction %I EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley %D 2003 %@ UCB/CSD-03-1286 %U http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2003/5776.html %F Hsieh:CSD-03-1286