Challenges and Tradeoffs in Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Driving
Alvin Kao
EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley
Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2020-111
May 29, 2020
http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2020/EECS-2020-111.pdf
Trajectory prediction is a necessary component of an autonomous driving pipeline because it is essential for safe and comfortable planning. However, most existing work in prediction only measures prediction performance in isolation on static datasets, as opposed to performance when used in conjunction with the rest of the autonomous driving pipeline. We show that commonly used prediction evaluation metrics on static datasets do not capture the full range of challenges faced by trajectory prediction algorithms in dynamic scenarios, and that no single prediction method works best for all situations. To do this, we implement and benchmark a variety of state-of-the-art prediction approaches, and evaluate their performance in conjunction with planning in simulated driving scenarios.
Advisors: Joseph Gonzalez
BibTeX citation:
@mastersthesis{Kao:EECS-2020-111, Author= {Kao, Alvin}, Editor= {Gonzalez, Joseph}, Title= {Challenges and Tradeoffs in Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Driving}, School= {EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley}, Year= {2020}, Month= {May}, Url= {http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2020/EECS-2020-111.html}, Number= {UCB/EECS-2020-111}, Abstract= {Trajectory prediction is a necessary component of an autonomous driving pipeline because it is essential for safe and comfortable planning. However, most existing work in prediction only measures prediction performance in isolation on static datasets, as opposed to performance when used in conjunction with the rest of the autonomous driving pipeline. We show that commonly used prediction evaluation metrics on static datasets do not capture the full range of challenges faced by trajectory prediction algorithms in dynamic scenarios, and that no single prediction method works best for all situations. To do this, we implement and benchmark a variety of state-of-the-art prediction approaches, and evaluate their performance in conjunction with planning in simulated driving scenarios.}, }
EndNote citation:
%0 Thesis %A Kao, Alvin %E Gonzalez, Joseph %T Challenges and Tradeoffs in Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Driving %I EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley %D 2020 %8 May 29 %@ UCB/EECS-2020-111 %U http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2020/EECS-2020-111.html %F Kao:EECS-2020-111